Categories
Personal Publishing

Using Blogdex to predict the Bloggies…

The most interesting contribution to the debate on the Bloggies so far has to be on Metafirda. She has produced a list of all the categories and ranked each of the nominees by their position on Blogdex. If the Bloggies are just a popularity contest then her theory is that she should be able to predict the winners. I did something similar last year by comparing Oscar winners with their positions on the IMDBs top 250 films.

Now of course this kind of enterprise is rife with assumptions. The first assumption is that the number of links to a site measures its current popularity. Clearly this isn’t necessarily true – links that were popular in the past but haved waned recently will get high positions. Newcomers will not. Unfortunately these figures are all we have to work with – we don’t have access to the stats of each and every site on display (and not all of the sites are comparable anyway).

Nonetheless an analysis of any differences between the results of the Bloggies and Blogdex’s rankings should help illustrate the kind of processes that are going on – they should give us a clearer idea of what it is that the Bloggies are measuring and more to the point, whether different categories are more involved than others. For example – while “Best Webring” is almost certainly going to be given to the ring that most webloggers have chosen to subscribe themselves to, “Best Tagline” will probably be voted for people judging the respective merits on the spot. I’d be really interested in seeing a comparative tally of the results with the predictions after the awards – perhaps as a combined Fairvue/Metafirda production. End

Categories
Personal Publishing

How to get more traffic to your weblog…

I got an e-mail a couple of days ago from a guy who wanted to know how to increase traffic to his weblog – god only knows why he chose to ask me, but there you go. I’m not entirely sure that my advice was quite what he was looking for, because I didn’t give him any revolutionary tips about secret search engine strategies or ways to control and influence the minds of young, hip and trendy scene-setters. In fact I can summarise what I said to him in just a few points:

  1. Search Engines:
    You can get traffic off search engines, but is it the kind of traffic that really interests you? The people who seek your site by running a search about “Sex with lubricated badgers” are going to be disappointed with your thoughts on identifying the gender of the black and white animals. And if you’re hoping to catch people who are just looking for a good weblog, remember that there are hundreds of thousands of other weblogs which are just as likely to appear in their search results. My opinion? Don’t bother.
  2. Site of the month/day/week etc
    Again – why bother. Most of the sites that give out awards do so to get traffic, not to give it to other people. And if they’re easy to win, they’re essentially useless, and will clutter up your site with badges and logos and buttons. If they’re not easy to get mentioned on – such as Blogger’s “Blogs of note”, then your chances of getting a link are almost ridiculously small – and frankly would be enhanced by paying attention to the only really important parts of the weblog process… Which are…
  3. Good quality design and content
    It may be dull, but it remains true – if you write good stuff and present it elegantly, then you’ll be well read in no time at all. Case in point – Trabaca is a site that I stumbled upon fairly recently. I’ve got quite entrenched in my weblog reads of late, and don’t tend to wander that much. But this site had an immediate visual impact for me – and it stuck in my head because of that. And then I discovered that it was a delight to read. So now it’s a regular destination for me. That’s the best model for encouraging regular visitors to your site – give them something worth coming to.

And even though I told myself I wouldn’t do this – here are a few ways in which you can up the quality of your design and content:

  1. What’s your site about?
    You don’t have to define yourself too closely, but if you can identify a spirit or a set of subjects that matter to you or that you have opinions about then you’re one step towards developing a weblog that people will be able to relate to.
  2. Branding
    It sounds really corporate, but just think about it for a minute – if you were building a site about hamsters, then you might do something kind of cutesy. If you were building a site about body-building, then you’d probably go for something really macho-looking. If it’s about the things you care about then it should have an appropriate look – one that is right for the discussion of the things you care about. Identify colours, images, themes and a name that works for you and is easily memorable. Make the name short!
  3. Opinions
    There are a thousand sites on the net which duplicate the popular links of the moment. Since the appearance of Blogdex, this has started to happen even more regularly. But this is not necessarily a problem unless those links are all you have to offer. What’s your opinion of the link? What’s your opinion on the story? These are the only things that people can’t get on any other site but yours. You may as well play to your strengths!
  4. Story-selection
    You went to the shop. That’s nice. You had a cookie. Great. You picked your arse. Excellent. Why are you writing this down? A hundred thousand things may happen to you in a day, or maybe nothing will have happened at all, but there will always be something worth talking about. And for everything worth talking about, there will be dozens of things that you did during the day that no one gives a damn about! Today I went to the loo, took two painkillers for my toothache and drank pink grapefruit juice. Do you give a damn? No.
  5. Good quality writing
    This one’s a bit tedious – check your grammar, check your spelling, feel comfortable going back and re-editing posts that don’t make immediate sense to your when you re-read them.

I’m not going to pretend that I do all these things all the time, or that I do them very well. Still – that’s my two-penneth. Hopefully you’ll find something useful in it.

Categories
Personal Publishing

There's nowhere to go but down…

The depressing thing about the Blogdex All-Time List is that there’s nowhere to go but down. In the few months that it has been up and running, I have gradually watched myself slump further and further down the list… Not that it matters, it doesn’t mean anything… It’s just kind of depressing that each time you pop in and check on who has been linking to your site recently, you see that it has become even less popular than such trivial institutions as Amazon, The World AIDS day ‘link and think’ campaign and some beardy gentleman called Jeffrey Zeldman. I mean – like anyone cares about them anyway? I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, “It’s all about me…” When will you bastards realise that?

Categories
Personal Publishing

Is there a decline in the potential of the form?

Addendum to post about weblogs obsessing on the trivia of people’s lives. I should clarify that I wasn’t so much talking about the tendency to write about the trivia of one’s life, but about the public perception of the weblogging phenomenon. Since I started it seems to have evolved from being viewed as a kind of web filter or industry comment organ through to being a kind of dynamic diarist medium where quality of writing was paramount to finally being viewed as a populist organ for the dissemination of trivia. I have no problem with weblogs of any of these types – and in fact they all have existed in one for or another for years before Blogger emerged. What I’m slightly surprised by is how the dominant perception of them has changed from journalism to personal writing to trivia. The ‘potential’ of the form seems to have become less interesting to people…

Categories
Personal Publishing

On changes in the weblog culture…

I found this one via Blogdex, which is always a shameful confession for me: Geoff Nunberg talks about the weblogging phenomenon (Real Audio). In this little radio segment, he compares weblogging, with all it’s diarist minutiae to Diary of a Nobody – which started me thinking. Exactly when did the weblogging format cease to be seen as a medium designed for insight and critical judgement and start being viewed as a place where people obsess about the trivia of their lives? I don’t think it had occurred to me before that this form of weblog was now the most prevalant – almost to the exclusion of other types. I don’t know how I feel about this…

Categories
Personal Publishing

Proglomena to a method of ranked privacy…

Proglomena to a method of ranked privacy on Greymatter weblogs:

  1. Define several user accounts for use on your greymatter weblog. Name each one according to a number or name representing a level of privacy that each post might have: eg. High, Medium, Low, General.
  2. Wrap each post in the template with a span or div attribute – the name of the attribute corresponding to the {{author}} attribute (normally used in the ‘this post written by {{author}})’ sections at the bottom of posts.
  3. Produce several stylesheets for the site. Each is identical except that each stylesheet can declare different classes ‘display: none;’.
  4. Using javascript to place a cookie on the site, you can then automatically assign the lowest level of ‘clearance’ to the site – all the posts will be in the code, but only the ‘General’ ones will be displayed on the page.
  5. Other pages, password protected in some way (.htaccess files for example) can place cookies which call different style-sheets, thus showing ‘Low’ or ‘Medium’ sensitivity posts as well.
  6. Or more interestingly, you could place a cookie on first arrival, a second cookie on second visit, a third on the next, and rank up the person’s clearance each time – thus giving them an incremental ‘trust’ rating. Other techniques for an automatic incrementalisation of ‘clearance’ could include an automatic placing of cookies built into the code in certain kinds of posts or internal pages. Only when you have seen a certain number of internal pages would you get access to the next level of content.
  7. Certain posts could be ONLY visible to the person who created the site.

Reasons for doing this? It keeps frivolous posting and personal revelation away from casual visitors and potential employers. Only those with whom you had built up a relationship of trust would be able to receive access to your stranger thoughts.

Categories
Personal Publishing

In which Wil Wheaton starts a weblog…

Ignore the griping, embrace the wonder and launch yourself straight over to Wil Wheaton’s Weblog. Will used to star as Wesley Crusher in Star Trek: The Next Generation. My favourite line from the Metafilter posts: “I am 17 years of age. Wil Wheaton is almost as familiar to me as, well, something really old.”

I’m going to get asked why I like this so much. I can’t explain it. There’s something so geek-cool about it, combined with the wonder that there’s someone on the other side of the minor celebrity wall who’s prepared to be as ridiculous as the rest of us. It’s a combination of bravery, chutzpah and a complete refusal to go all corporate and ridiculously celebrity-site-ish that endears it to me.

And Metafilter keeps coming with the good lines: “TV’s Wil Wheaton transcends the A-list” [said by Succaland]. If I met him, I’d buy him a beer (along with Steve).

Categories
Journalism Personal Publishing

Keith Waterhouse on weblogs?

Writing a good weblog can be, at times, much like writing a column for a newspaper. I’ve got an old article on writing a column which I’d like to put up in a public place. It’s by Keith Waterhouse – an old Fleet Street columnist. He gives 25 points – not all of which, of course, are appropriate for the weblogger. Pick and choose.

1) It’s not so much what you say as the way that you say it. Your column must have a distinctive voice, to the extent that if your byline were accidentally dropped, your readers would still know who was writing. If your style isn’t instantly recognisable, what you have there is not a column but a signed article.

2) Every columnist needs a good half dozen hobby horses. But do not ride them to death. Once you have sounded off again about, say, Euro Bureaucracy, leave the subject alone for at least six months (unless you happen to be Christopher Booker). “I make no apologies for returning to…” is not an apology but an excuse.

3) Feeling passionate about a subject does not necessarily make it interesting reading. Veal is a good example: outside the news pages, no one has ever written an interesting word about veal.

4) The fact that your column contains no facts does not mean that you need not have checked them like any other journalist. In other words, you must be sure of your case. You are allowed to generalise – “Our children are the worst educated in Europe” only if your wild generalisations, when tamed, can be substantiated.

5) The more cuttings you accumulate, the more you will be tempted to offload them on your readers, like the celebrated Scottish leader writer who, returning late from a liquid lunch with a deadline to meet, clipoed the main leader from the Times, scrawled “What does the Times mean by this?” above it and sent it down to the printer. Packing the column with other people’s quotes is the columnar equivalent of watering the milk. Assimilate the material and then discard it.

6) Avoid kneejerk reactions. You don’t necessarily have to produce a paragraph every time Fergie does something stupid or a politician’s wife announces that she’s standing by him. If the readers can predict what you’re going to say, there’s little point in saying it – and even less in their reading it.

7) Let the bandwagon roll by. Even if every columnist in the land is commenting on the mother unjustly sent to prison or the teacher who handcuffed the child to a radiator, you don’t have to jump aboard unless you have something to say that the others haven’t already said.

8) On the other hand, although it’s not always necessary to write about the main news event of the day, there are times when the occasion demands it. Given a Hillsborough disaster, for example, there is no point in writing about anything else since nobody will be talking about anything else.

9) Let the leader writer write the leader.

10) Having something to write about is not the same as having something to say. If you really have no opinions to speak of beyond, say, liking Princess Di and not liking Prince Charles, you are in the wrong job and perhaps even in the wrong trade.

11) Don’t ever try to fake it. Nothing is so transparent as insincerity – pile on the adjectives though you may, false indignation has the ring of a counterfeit coin.

12) Your thoughts on mobile phones in railway carriages have already been thought. Likewise your musings on muzak in pubs.

13) It is 106 years since Jerome K Jerome related his difficulties in trying to open a tin of pineapple in Three Men In A Boat. Unless you can improve this classic account, keep your problems with packaging to yourself.

14) Notwithstanding Bernard Levin’s celebrated intervention with the Gas Board on behalf of his mother, a column should not be used to pursue a personal grudge against a public utility company, bank, supermarket, commuter line etc. unless it is going to ring bells with most of your readers.

15) Does anyone care about St George’s Day? No. So why keep on asking, year after year, why no one cares about St George’s Day.

16) Be wary about following up items clipped from local papers – unless you are writing for the local paper. References to the barmy burghers of Brent or the wacky wimmin of Wolverhapton do not usually travel well, unless they have a wider implication.

17) Although you may allow your readers a few restricted glimpses into your private life, no one really wants to hear about your personal ups and downs any more than they want to hear about the lady next door’s operation. So your daughter got into university. Tell your mother. If you tell the readers, you will only infuriate those whose daughters didn’t get into university.

18) If you must write about your holidays, do it on picture postcards to family and friends. This rule particularly applies should you be tempted to drool on about five course meals consumed in Normandy with all the wine you could drink and change out of 30 francs.

19) Do not expose your spouse to the glare of the public – especially not by the whimsical name of Him Indoors or She Who Must Be Obeyed. The same goes for the misadventures or quirky comments of your family and the daffy behaviour of your family’s dog.

20) There is no real need to mention that you have been on radio or television again. Your readers no longer regard it as any big deal.

21) If your second topic begins, “Talking of which”, “Which reminds me”, or “While on the subject”, you have picked the wrong second topic. However the item does start, it should metaphorically say, “And now for something completely different.”

22) Should you wear a hat, do not ever offer to eat it. Predictions are for astrologers. If you do make a prediction and you are wrong, as you are almost certain to be, don’t start your subsequent column with the words “All right, so I have egg on my face”. Forget it. Your readers already have.

23) Bitchy comments on the private lives or personal tastes of the famous have enlivened many a column, but there is a point at which they can tip over into mere mud slinging. A good question is: “Why am I saying this?” If the answer is “Because I want to be the new Jean Rook”, spike it.

24) Columnar feuds are amusing to other columnists and may even yield them copy, provided they don’t mind living vicariously. The readers, or what Craig Brown describes as “that diminishing minority of people who do not write newspaper columns” find them bemusing.

25) Make up your own catchphrases. “I think we should be told,” being six words, is the copyright of Sir John Junor.

Categories
Personal Publishing

A new definition of 'weblog'…

A place where people who aren’t heard in everyday life can not be heard online.

Categories
Personal Publishing

On Fictional Weblogging…

Ok – it’s occurred to all of us at one time or another – weblogging is based upon the presumption of authenticity – people actually writing about their own lives. But this presumed authenticity is almost certainly to a greater or lesser extent a fantasy – while I’m sure most webloggers don’t lie about their lives, I’d be surprised if people were not selectively choosing what to write about in such a way that would alter people’s perceptions of their life.

So I’m sure it’s occurred to many of us at certain times to set up fictional weblogs – to generate completely articificial online personae. I know that it’s occurred to Matt and Nick because they’ve both talked about it with me. But what no one has yet talked about is undertaking weblogs of already established fictional characters. I mean – it would be a tremendous fan site for Buffy to have a weblog ostensibly maintained by Willow, with links and commentary based around what happened to her in the latest episode. And from a more literary perspective, a weblog based upon Sherlock Holmes writing each day about his cases (assembling itself into a chronology of the work of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle) might be both interesting and academically valuable. Are there any weblogs like this out there? If not, why not?