How can it be that I only watch American television and yet there is nothing on American television that I want to watch?! Last night (and this morning) I’ve been compelled to convert to Christianity, forced to ask my Mormon neighbour about something, overheard lots of celebrity gossip and been informed by middle-aged housewives who talk in soundbites about the better call rates of certain long-distance providers. In the middle – somewhere – was an episode of Digimon that seemed utterly incomprehensible to me. There was some wrestling too which was supposed to end at one time, but just kept going. I think. It’s probably just a problem of navigation or context – I have absolutely no idea where to get the television I enjoy watching – no idea how to watch the TV I see. None, whatsoever. In the end, we found ourselves watching The Antiques Roadshow with Hugh Scully on PBS. Phew! What a relief!
Voyage to San Francisco…
Ok. So Mr Webb and I have arrived in the States just as San Francisco’s weather appears to be at its very nicest. We’re (or I am) a bit bowled over by the nine-and-a-bit hour flight, so I’m going to leave you with some samples of the pictures I got of ice-flows and frozen oceans in our travels across the Arctic Circle…



Thinking about iChat…
I’ve been thinking a bit about instant messaging clients since I submitted my IM contacts to Buddyzoo. In order to upload my buddy lists I had to switch from iChat – my default messaging client – to AIM. For the first time in months I remembered how useful it is to produce groups of your contacts. I really miss that piece of functionality.
Anyway – around that point I started thinking about how iChat could handle groups like AIM, and I starting thinking about the power of having multiple buddy lists held in multiple windows. What would it be like if your AIM contacts could be picked up and dragged between multiple iChat windows – one for your friends, one for your co-workers, one for your family etc. You’d still only have one AIM account, of course, but it would be represented differently.

Perhaps – if you didn’t like multiple windows for each semantic group – you could dock them together – producing bespoke metagroups like “Friends and Family” versus “Work”. Maybe the places where the windows fused could become handles that allowed you to resize each pane individually.
And then I started thinking about the other effects that could have – what if each window handled login information separately? What if each one used the inbuilt AIM buddy-blocking system on-the-fly so you could spontaneously decide to disappear from the world of your work colleagues while staying online with all your friends and family. Or the other way around? It’s surely just an interface tweak? What do people think?
Emerging Man…
As of this coming Thursday I’m heading to California (San Francisco first, then Santa Clara for Emerging Tech, before returning to SF) for a total of twelve days of intense West-Coast mind-expansion. I’ve not looked forward to anything quite this much in years – although the difficult situation at UpMyStreet is obviously preying on my mind and for a while made me think that I might not be able to go…
While I’m in the States, I’m keen to drench myself in everything interesting that’s going on in the industry as well as meet all those people who (at the moment) I only know online. If you’d like to meet up while I’m in the area – either socially or professionally – then drop me a line at tom [at] plasticbag [dot] org. Oh. And Webb’s going too.
Alexa rankings vs site traffic…
There was a slightly weird article in the Guardian a few days ago about UpMyStreet & MyVillage that I don’t really have an opinion about. But it inspired an interesting response from Tomski’s weblog where he talks about several interesting ways of estimating site traffic as well as an interesting suggestion about the way traffic could be plotted against alexa rankings to see if any predictable curve emerged…
So there’s an article in the Guardian today about UpMyStreet. The article is called Street Plight and aims to understand why the company is in administration. Now generally, it’s a pretty flattering article – and a fairly accurate one – but there are odds and ends that are a bit annoying. Nonetheless I’ve decided that I’m going to look on the sunny side and concentrate on phrases like “Upmystreet is full of brainy types” and “[UpMyStreet Conversations is] a bit like a pub”. Yes. I think I’d much rather concentrate on those than the the rather less flattering “Technical people become dazzled by their own wizardry” and “Frankly, you could have more scintillating conversation with a curtain”.
Sigh. It’s no good. It’s not working. So here goes. Here’s why Clint Witchell’ss comments on Conversations are unfair:
One – it’s unfair to take the conversations in any one particular area and claim they’re representative of the whole site. Like every other community, Conversations is only as interesting as the people who participate in it, but unlike any other community – every area gets a different degree of participation. Certain parts of the country are beginning to explore the uses of the site and get involved in serious debates. Other areas are using it to chat about local news and to find local tradespeople. Other areas aren’t using it at all. It’s early days. All I can say is that if you don’t like the conversations that are ongoing in your area at the moment but you can see the potential and value in a site that could help your neighbourhood engage with local issues – then don’t just sit there complaining and feeling superior – start a conversation and see what kind of responses you get!
Two – Conversations is a new product for UpMyStreet and it pushes the ways the site can be used into completely new areas. One of our aims was to try and develop the relationship between UpMyStreet and the people who use come to it – to make people more regular visitors and power users at that. I think we’ve had a certain amount of success with this kind of work, success that I think will grow as people get more used to the idea and start to use the site in different ways. It’s a process of development that aims to move people from simple information finding into treating the site as a bridge into their local neighbourhood. But we’re not all the way there yet. These things don’t necessarily happen overnight…
Three – just because you can’t see obvious commercial uses for the forums software doesn’t mean that there aren’t any or that we haven’t thought about it seriously! If we get the opportunity, you’ll see exactly what we’re talking about and all the commercial/charitable/political uses for the technology, but at the moment – unfortunately – we’re all a bit distracted trying to keep body and soul together! Bear with us! Have some faith!
This is for a very narrow niche audience, but if you are one of the two or three people who have expressed an interest in how plasticbag.org embeds Trackback links at the end of each entry then here’s how you do it. Only a limited amount of computer magic is undertaken. Basically on both the main index template for the site and the individual template for each entry (and any other archiving templates you want to use), I insert this code directly after my <$MTEntryBody$> tag:
<MTEntryIfAllowPings>
<ul style=”list-style: none;”>
<MTPings>
<li> → <$MTPingBlogName$>: <a href=”<$MTPingURL$>” title=”Trackback from <$MTPingBlogName$>”><$MTPingTitle$></a></li>
</MTPings>
</ul>
</MTEntryIfAllowPings>
Don’t forget, in order for autodiscovery to work when someone else does pings your site you have to make sure that you’ve included the <$MTEntryTrackbackData$> tag in your template. I don’t know if there’s a restriction on where it can be placed. I just stick it directly after my <MTEntries> tag.
Remember: Most of the archive templates will not automatically rebuild every time you get a trackback ping, but they will if they get a comment – so either leave the your comments on or run a rebuild every few days just to make sure that everything’s kept up to date.
One for the Mirror Project…
There’s a road in the middle of London called Oxford Street. It’s the main thoroughfare for shopping in the capital. One night on my way home I spotted an exotic advert – a actual pair of trousers apparently suspended in water. It was dark, so the lights inside the advert seemed to make the bubbles blown in from the bottom glow like tiny jellyfish as they crept and teemed around the pockets and the button-fly. I took a picture to try and capture the atmosphere but in the process got a ghostlike image of myself on the left of the frame. Beneath my face you can see fragments of red lettering – the upcoming-bus-times displayed behind me on the bus stop… I’ve submitted it to The Mirror Project, of course…

Register Refutations…
A week or so ago I wrote a little post called Oh Self-Correcting Blogosphere. It was about an article at The Register in which Andrew Orlowski managed to mix a few half-facts with some general paranoia to assemble the spectre of a censorious and manipulative cabal of either webloggers or Google managers.
Orlowski’s gone off on another one this week – and this one’s considerably more ludicrous than the one before. This time – in the article Google washes Whiter – he’s protesting that his previous article has been hidden from people who search for the word “Googlewash” on the search engine:
“Google has made its own statement on the ‘Googlewash’: by making The Register story that coined the phrase disappear from its search results. Not all the search results, mark you, but a very specific one. When you search for the word “Googlewash” (as at 9pm Pacific Time last night) around a hundred results are returned by default. Our story, which is where the word was coined, isn’t among them. We found it, eventually, but it was very difficult.”
The stunning problem with his hypothesis (which was – if you remember – that his article has been censored by Google) is that if you click on the very first link offered then you are immediately directed straight to the article in question. All that’s happened is that – for some presumably totally obvious reason – Metafilter’s article about Googlewashing gets higher prominence. Whether that’s because Metafilter has a higher page-rank and gets linked to more often generally or whether it’s because people linked to this particular discussion with more apposite keywords (like ‘Googlewash’ for example)- well I don’t know. What I do know is that if Google were trying to hide Orlowski’s ‘revelations’, then they’ve made a ludicrously bad hash of it. And if he were looking for censorship, perhaps he should be looking comparatively, since anyone with half a brain can find his article more easily through Google than via altavista or overture or alltheweb.
Meta-kottke…
Because you turn around for a moment and he’s gone and posted another dozen links (and because – if I’m honest – I’m seldom resistant to repurposing his work), I present “Meta-kottke: Reading the remaindered so you don’t have to” (filtered from Jason’s recent remaindered links bin):
- Apple buying Universal Music
Good story if it’s true. If it’s true then it’s connected to the other big Apple rumour – that they’re going to be selling MP3 equivalents over the interhighweb as quickly as next month. - So webloggers talk into a video camera and it gets on TV?
What a dumb / brilliant idea. Way better than that thing with the monkey that Pepsi want to do that I was talking about yesterday… - Converting PC applications to OSX – Apple’s interface guidelines are totally fascinating. One of the best things I’ve read today. Thanks Jason!
- Article about Powerpoint. And let’s end with a profoundly annoying post. Argument: You either too much writing on your presentation and everyone reads it instead of looking at you or you don’t write anything and the presentation means nothing when you’re done. Why argument is bunk: Because there’s a bit under the slide where you can explain what the slide means – the equivalent of having someone there to talk you through it. If you write the bloody thing.