Categories
Random

On the third birthday of plasticbag.org…

On Friday morning, plasticbag.org reached the age of three years old. It seems like a fairly major milestone to me – maybe three years is the time when you begin to think to yourself, “Is this actually something I’m going to be doing for the foreseeable future – maybe for the rest of my life?” A scary thought…

If you’re interested enough – and god knows why you would be – you can still read the first weblog post I ever made over a thousand days ago… A thousand days… It would be good to be able to say that I’d posted almost every day of that time, but since I’ve just bunked off for almost a week, I think that might seem a bit cheeky…

So what’s happened over the last three years? What have I accomplished? I’ve met loads of new friends. I’ve gone from starting work at Time Out to being Production Editor of their website, through to unemployment, helping out on TCN, working on an education site for Europeans and Ethiopians and building a community for the BBC. Now I’m at UpMyStreet.com. I’ve had a couple of different relationships – mostly disasterous. I’ve sapped around quite a bit – as if there was a storm-cloud perpetually around me, and bounced around like a puppy for much briefer, but much more memorable, amounts of time.

I’ve written an awful lot of crap on my site, but I’ve also written odds and ends that I’ll always be able to keep and look at and be proud of. I’ve also pissed any number of people off. Which probably suggests I’m doing something right…

So where to go from here? God knows. I’d be lying if I said I never got bored of thinking of something to offer up to the world each day. I do. Show me another three-year vintage weblogger that doesn’t feel that occasionally. I don’t think the future will contain as much about my personal life, because I think after a while the more you write about something, the thinner it gets… It’s like you wear it out. After a while you want something that’s just for you – that’s yours alone and that you share with no one. I’ve already been writing less and less about what I do away from the computer… So I think the future probably lies more in the ideas that I have, or the opinions that I need to express. Maybe that’s the direction that weblogging itself will be taking as the huge Blogger Boom generation of the last two years settles down and tries to find a sense of purpose for their sites – a reason to keep writing every day. I can only hope that’ll be interesting enough to keep you guys sticking around…

In the meantime, thanks for coming and I’ll see you all in three years time… xx Tom

Categories
Random

A weekend in Norfolk…

A weekend away from London is one thing – a weekend with the family is quite another. You never know whether it’ll be pleasant or nightmarish. Will it end with smiles or scowls? It was nearly a disaster before I even arrived. The trip across London was a nightmare in rain and public transport, and I missed my train by thirty seconds. The next train was double the price, and some bloody woman who had claimed two seats glared at me when I asked if I could sit down for the two hour journey… Halfway through the journey – an hour away from Norwich, I took a picture of Colchester station…

The following day we decided to go to the beach. My memories of the North Norfolk coast basically revolve around my step-father trying to get me to swim in the North Sea and it being cold and rainy. So I was a little grudging about the plan, but we all piled into the car nonetheless and drove north…

My suspicion had evaporated by the time we reached Brancaster. The day was beautiful, and the sky – the thing I miss most of all in London – was, well, everywhere. My mother and brother wandered off in one direction…

… while my father took the dog off for a bit of a paddle …

The beach was almost empty – there was a couple playing with a kite, and some people walking a couple of dogs on the horizon. But for the most part, there was nothing for miles around us in every direction… Even looking away from the beach…

My brother has an incredible throwing arm. He can launch a tennis ball into orbit, throwing at least twice as far as any of the rest of us can manage. Our dog – Tango – loves this, and will run backwards and forwards for hours and hours, fetching ball after ball…

At the high-water mark, the beach was crunchy with shells…

After a while we stumbled upon some mud-flats… It’s easy to walk on mud-flats for about twenty seconds, and then all the grippy parts of your shoes fill with clay and crap, which makes the soles of your shoes feel like huge slippy pats of butter, only black…

Some of the mud-flats rise up into creases by some kind of weird natural process. If you get close to them and photograph them close-up, they start to resemble hills, mountains and canyons…

Anyway – no walk can last forever, so we turned to head back to the restaurant, only to be confronted by one of the most beautiful skies I’d ever seen…

Categories
Random

On the usurpation of a screening of Donnie Darko…

I can’t even count the amount of times recently that I’ve written about the movie Donnie Darko. I’m obsessed by it, it’s clear. But now you have the chance to get obsessed with it too, and I’m going to help you do it. No, I’m not going to pay for it. No, I’m not going to rub your ears and hold the popcorn while you watch it. Instead I’m inviting you all to come and see it with me, and with all the other loony friends that I’ve got that happened to be available on the same night. And the night? Tomorrow. Halloween.

Well that’s actually slightly innaccurate. In fact what’s actually happening is that Barbelith is inviting you to experience Donnie Darko Movie Madness tomorrow night. We’re going to claim the whole cinema for cool people, nice people, fun people – you know… my people. I’m totally serious about this.. It’s a great film and you’re all more than welcome – you’re expected to attend. And after the movie? Some kind of drinking, I should think… Yes definitely… A drink. Maybe several…

Categories
Random

Oh for god's sake…

With regard to the people who are slamming my comments on ‘the power of the incoming link’ [1 & 2] – could I just clarify that I was not talking about Stephen Den Beste… The theory – that the non-specific warblogger that I’ve referred to recently was Mr Den Beste – was first taken up I think by Flit and has now spread to a number of other sites, including Instapundit and Bitchpundit. Each of these sites has its own particularly charming stance on what I’ve said. But it’s all based on a false assumption, I’m afraid, because I wasn’t talking about him at all… As such I’m going to take Flit’s statement at face value and accept that the misunderstanding was not intentional and accept his pre-emptive apology…

There are a few things that I clearly still have to clarify… I’m talking about individuals having a different way to campaign for what they believe in – whatever ‘what they believe in’ might be. The fact that I’m left-of-centre clearly informs the things that I feel strongly about – the things that I’m prepared to campaign for. But essentially all I’m looking for is a way for a community of individuals to have more influence – more, but equal influence – on each other because I think that there have to be campaigning techniques that operate in addition to argument or debate… If you’re not convinced by the techniques I suggested, then that’s ok… I’m not trying to present a fait accompli

One of the things that people have talked about is how I’m trying to restrict people’s freedom of expression so that only people who agree with my particular brand of politics can be heard. This is simply, bluntly, once and for all, just wrong. I believe that everyone should be able to stand up for what they believe in – I’m just suggesting a way in which people can do that. The approach I’ve suggested might be hideously flawed, but it doesn’t stop the individual concerned writing what they want on their site, nor does it stop anyone else linking to them. So i can’t see how it interferes with their freedom of speech at all, or how it isolates them. All it does it give some people a public way to register their protest without writing about it (and thus in a way promoting it) on their own sites.

I’ve had a lot of feedback on some of this stuff, and it’s been fairly mixed – the more sober stuff has been the most interesting – some people view it as a useful and poweful kind of protest, others think of it as against the idea of the web as a discursive space, and others think that such a view gives legal credibility to people who want to control incoming links to their commercial sites. Some of these I agree with – some of them I don’t… I’ve been less thrilled with the responses from people whose level of argument has been to criticise my teeth though or who describe anything they don’t agree with as “Saudi-Arabian-style”. My favourite one of these comments though has been the one that describes me as having, “a serious inferiority complex when it comes to learning from [my] moral and intellectual superiors.” I quite liked that one…

Categories
Random

London poster inspires a total lack of confidence in the world…

I’ve had issues with the levels of surveillance that are appearing in the UK for quite a while now. When I lived in Hampstead I remember remarking that there was no point between my front door and my desk at work where I was not on at least one camera. Every so often someone decides to celebrate the terrifying amount of cameras around us all and hey normally do that with a poster telling us all how safe we are now that we’re continually examined. Just recently a new poster started appearing around London, and frankly it’s terrifying beyond measure. It looks like the cover of a 1950s alien-invasion novel, and drips with the sentiments of 1984’s Big Brother posters. But it’s difficult to know what to complain about – the poster itself is more than a little distasteful, but at least it’s triggering a little alarm from liberal parts of the country. Without it we’d probably accept this stuff without a second thought…

Categories
Random

Regarding the responsibility of linkage…

An excerpt from an e-mail I sent yesterday – partially adapted for publishing on plasticbag.org– explaining why I think we need a campaigning or protest tool in excess of the simple publishing of opinions – perhaps along the lines of my proposed inbound link strategy…

Basically, I’m trying to work out if there is some kind of direct action or demonstration that one can do within the blogosphere other than simply express one’s opinions. I’m looking for another approach because of this double-bind: if you link to a person with extreme views in order to debunk them, then to an extent you’re actually promoting them – you’re sending traffic to them, you’re giving their views a certain legitimacy. But if you don’t link to them, and you don’t publically talk about them, then aren’t you like the man who lets evil flourish through his inaction? What’s the right thing to do?

I’m certainly not trying to set up rules of governance of the internet or regulate it – I’m just suggesting that if free speech is the only political tool at our disposal, then we’ll inevitably end up with people having to shout more and more loudly in order to be heard at all. The ambient volume therefore just escalates and drowns out more nuanced, less absolutist or dogmatic attitudes. It should be possible to express ones dissent (or horror) with some kind of silence, sit-in or direct action – something maybe a bit like the Beatles returning their MBE’s to Buckingham Palace…

Obviously this is not to say that the specific tactics I suggested are necessarily appropriate or the right way to go, but I think the motivation behind the idea is a good one, and I’d be interested in anyone else’s suggestions…

Categories
Radio & Music Technology

How to fill a 5Gb iPod…

So here’s what the thing would be if I were really bored and absurdly anal on a Sunday early-evening… As an iPod early-adopter, I may be the last person left in the Western hemisphere with a mere 5Gb to fill. And I’ve ripped nearly 12Gb of my own albums onto my computer. So I clearly have a problem here – how do I choose what to put onto it? Of the 2822 songs currently on my Mac, only 535 songs have yet to be rated (star ratings out of five – rating songs is the new ‘alphabetising my record collection’), and these include several new albums I’ve bought recently along with some older stuff that I don’t really want to write off just yet, but at the same time can’t really say that I’ve demonstrated much inclination to listen to either…

There are several considerations – one being the highly frustrating way that the iTunes randomise function only randomises the first time you make a playlist – so you can’t have one list that changes dynamically. This is highly frustrating.

Quickly – some dumb figures: 5 star songs: 281, 4 star songs: 991, 3 star songs: 691, 2 star songs: 286, 1 star songs: 38. In principle the scoring mechanism that has evolved works like this – I would not be averse to listening to at any time any song that gets three to five stars. Two star songs are an irritation. One star songs are just irredeemably awful. One star songs are mostly from Moby’s “18” or represent the most self-indulgent of The Magnetic Fields’ oeuvre… Other considerations to bear in mind – classical music is interesting, but not always ideal for listening to on the bus or down the street, I add new music all the time and wish it to be represented on my iPod before I have had the chance to assign it a rating, humourous songs often become less humourous after a fairly short amount of time. There are many many other criteria in play here as well – so many in fact that ideally I would need someone to do some comprehensive analysis on the subject and return to me with a set of criteria that one could use as a basis for evolving appropriate smart playlists. Here’s my attempt so far…

  • 5-star songs:
    This smart playlist operates according to the following principles:
    My rating is 5-stars, Genre is not Educational or Classical, limited to 1210 Mb selected by random.
    Significantly, this represents essentially every single 5-star song I own except for a batch of scientific songs by Tom Glazer that may be empiracally wonderful but can become irritating, and classical pieces which are often simply too long to warrant inclusion.

  • 4-star songs:
    This smart playlist operates according to the following principles:
    My rating is 4-stars, Genre is not Educational, Classical or Humour, limited to 650 songs selected by random.
    This represents 2.69Gb of the space on my iPod, except that since several of my smart playlists randomly select some of the same tracks, there is no particular benefit in specifying exactly how much space it should occupy. This is a fairly savagely cut selection from the 991 songs that I’ve given a full four stars too. There simply isn’t space to do otherwise. Note the addition of humour to the banned genre… Five star comedy may remain entertaining… Four star may not…

  • 4-star songs (running):
    This smart playlist operates according to the following principles:
    My rating is 4-stars, Genre is not Educational, Classical or Humour, limited to 200 songs selected by date added.
    Now we have to add an element of movement into the organisation of the iPod. Since we can only have a selection of the four-star songs that are available, a choice has to be made as to which ones will be chosen. A purely random selection that isn’t dynamically different each time would relegate some songs to obscurity, and more importantly would remain uniformly distributed – there would be no sense of progress… By choosing the 200 most recently added 4-star songs, I make sure that my iPod changes and responds to my daily whim…

  • Most Played:
    This smart playlist operates according to the following principles:
    My rating is better than 2 stars, limited to 300 songs selected by most played.
    This list has precisely the opposite function of the one above – to be a stable chart of songs that I seem to not want to be without. The removal of anything with a rating under 3 stars makes sure I don’t accidentally get stuck with something I’ve come to hate.

  • Recent Additions:
    This smart playlist operates according to the following principles:
    My rating is not 1 stars / 2 stars / or 3 stars, limited to 60 songs selected by recently added.
    Essentially this list is simply to catch stuff that I’ve added but have not as yet come to a conclusion about. The removal of anything with one, two or three stars means that I don’t waste time listening to stuff that I have come to a conclusion about, while anything that has yet to be rated remains included.

  • Recently Played:
    This smart playlist operates according to the following principles:
    My rating is not 1 or 2 stars / or 3 stars, limited to 40 Mb, selected by last played.
    Because it’s possible that I could have a song in my head when I leave my flat, and for it not to be on my iPod, I instituted a list that kept track of what had been listened to in roughly the last forty minutes and made sure that was always with me. A tiny additional list that has been a complete life-saver many times…

This feels a bit Open University-esque. It’s an almost total waste of weblog space as well. Except that I am serious – if someone out there has done some research into these things I’m sure that a company like Apple would be interested… A default ‘my music collection’ playlist that intuited what kind of things you actually wanted to carry around with you (with whatever obscure algorithm it used) would probably be quite appealing to some people…

Categories
Net Culture Personal Publishing Politics

On the responsibility of linkage…

Ok. Right. This is where things start to get interesting. Firstly, a metaphor. Imagine if you will a solar system – let’s make it a binary system with planets that fly around it. Watch the suns move around one another. Watch the planets move around the suns. Watch the moons move around the planets. Watch their stable arcs cascading around one another. The reason they do this? We all know the answer – the various entities have an influence on one another that we call gravity… This influence, exerted by each and every participant in this system, is what keeps the system stable. If the gravity was dramatically lower, the celestial bodies would fly off from one another into deep space. If the gravity was dramatically higher, the celestial bodies would collapse in on themselves, forming one body – a symbolic monolith…

Let’s move in a different direction for a moment. Must we as liberal individuals believe in a world that gives each and every opinion equal weight. Are all views equally “valid”, “worthwhile”, “right”? And where does this leave us when we vehemently disagree with the tactics that people promoting these views start to use? And where do we end up when the views we must consider “valid” are precisely those views which don’t believe other views to be “valid”, “worthwhile”, “right” and are prepared to say so, and/or do something about it.

This last assertion is one of the simplest paradoxes of liberalism. But it’s not a model worth operating with. And here’s where the solar system comes in. Because a world in which we – as individuals or groups – are unable to extert any kind of pressure on anyone else for doing what we believe to be wrong resembles a solar system without gravity – an immediate explosion occurs, critical divergence, utter lack of stability. And a world in which we – as individuals or groups – are able to extert total pressure on anyone else for doing what we believe to be wrong resembles a solar system with absolute gravity – an immediate imposion occurs, monolithic thinking, totalitarianist repression, totally lack of motion, inertia, death.

The weblog space is a space that bends under the pressure of traffic and influence. But mostly it bends under the strength of reputation (earned by “good work” or unearned by association and / or tacit sanctioning by those who have done “good work”). And I now believe that as an individual operating responsibly in this sphere, I have to be aware of any and all potential abilities I have to legitimately (ie. without lying, cheating or unfairly manipulating the situation in any way) exert whatsoever influence I might have in order to stop what I perceive to be morally wrong, corrupt politics, cheap argument and potentially warmongering. (And yes – if you’re beginning to catch on – I am again talking about warbloggers). I think I’ve come up with something that I believe to be appropriate action in these circumstances, and it’s to do with the responsibilities of being linked to

At the moment one very specific site is in my mind. This site, which I will not link to, links to a considerable number of intelligent and interesting people. Many of whom don’t share the politics or attitude of the man in question. Each one of these people is in a situation to act in such a way that would demonstrate their profound disagreement with those views simply by dint of their link being on his page. What I’m suggesting is that there is a power that comes with being linked to – and it’s a power that one should not only be aware of, but should feel the responsibility to employ – whether by sending a simple e-mail askind the link to be removed (“I do not wish to be associated with the bile-ridden drivel on your site”), or more proactively and campaigningly by using an .htaccess file or something similar to serve up a page which declares that you refuse to be associated with the views of the person whose site you’ve just left.

It’s not a lot, I know, but it’s the first thing that I can think of that actually represents some kind of weblogging ‘direct action’ – some kind of (almost negligible at the individual scale) gravitational influence that can be exerted by a site to act in such a way that it makes itself known as protesting without driving additional traffic to the thing they’re protesting about… And the best thing about it is that it’s entirely non-violent, non-flaming, non-confrontational. It’s a kind of passive politics – refusal to participate – refusal to allow yourself to be referenced – a bizarre kind of work-to-rule… The power of the inbound link should not be ignored…

PS. To clarify, maybe I can give a couple of examples… Let’s say a site links to yours that is homophobic – not a specific link to a specific page, but rather a general blog-rolling style link. To mention that site – to link to it – will promote their agenda, give them more page impressions, more people reading the crap they write. So what you could do instead is use an .htaccess file to shunt them through to a site that debunks myths about being gay.

Follow-ups:

Categories
Random

On the insecurity of Blogger…

First things first – here’s a quick (rough) timeline of what happened from my perspective:

  • 3.30pm Phil Gyford notices that something has gone wrong with the listing of plasticbag.org posts on Haddock blogs. My assumption? Something has gone wrong with haddock blogs…
  • 3.40pm A quick glance at my RSS feed revealed that each and every link attribute on my RSS feed now read as ‘hacx0red’. My assumption? Someone has hacked into my server…
  • 3.45pm In still logged into my Blogger account so I go and check the settings. There’s something very wrong going on – my password, my e-mail address and the URL for my site have been replaced with the word ‘hacx0red’. My assumption? Someone has hacked into my Blogger account…
    Screenshot One
    Screenshot Two
    Screenshot Three

  • 3.50pm Beacuse I’m nervous about logging out, I try logging in with a different user name in a different browser. This does not work. My assumption? The world’s gone freakin’ craaaazy
  • 3.53pm I start telling people that I think Blogger’s been hacked. People freak out.
  • 4.00pm The UK’s weblogger mailing list becomes full of nervous people, and the information starts going out. Various people try to work out how to get in contact with Ev. We finally manage to get the word to Anil Dash who sends the word on further…
  • 4.10pm Danny O’Brien and Phil Gyford are getting the word out to Scripting.com.

So where does this leave us? It leaves us nervous, I think. It leaves us with less faith than before that it’s safe to leave the collective writings of years in the hands of a centralised service like Blogger. What would be lost if 700,000 people lost days, weeks, months or years of writing at the same time? Significantly I think if there was an import / export facility to Blogger that would allow people to keep their own back-ups, then this would be less of an issue. In the meantime, I’m afraid I have to confess that while I’m very impressed by the speed of Blogger’s reaction, I’m not overly impressed by the stuff that they’ve written about the experience. I think it’s important that someone explains to us why we should not be worried by this hack on an archive of content that – after all – was created and belongs to each of us…

Further reading: Slashdot.org, Anil Dash, Quicktopic thread, Blogger Status.

Categories
Random

A summary of Doonesbury Day Five: Weblog Gibberish (and links to the episodes you might have missed)…

October 26 I’ve had it with Linux! Regime Change has failed! Let’s think inside the box, people! It’s time to put the pedal to the paradigm! Join a sleeper cell, then quit and turn everyone in! Got war? Is our children learning? Mark my words, so you can find them later!” That’s right… I am Jenny McTagarthy, Girl Pirate! (You may have missed how big is my fan-base and a crush on Jenny…)