Categories
Random

On forcing oneself to do stuff…

So I’ve been thinking about the term to ‘force yourself to do something’ and kind of reeling at the absurdity of it all. I mean how can you force yourself to do something? Somewhere in your head you have one version of yourself pushing another version of yourself to do something they don’t want to do? Presumably kicking and screaming? But they’re both you, right? Not just the one that’s doing the forcing, but also the one being forced. So you might as well say that you were, “trying to resist forcing yourself to do something”. That would be equally bunk, right? I mean it would make as much sense, and realistically is a feeling I’m more familiar with.

So both the forced and the forcer ‘you’ are component parts of you. You can’t just identify with one of them. Which makes me think a bit about free will and which parts of the mind are genetically encoded and whether the part of the brain that needs to be forced is somehow being characterised as base matter – like we used to think of the body as being – with the forcer being our animating spark of divine will trying to get the corpse-like flesh of the body moving in a useful direction – the lightning to our Frankenstein’s monster of lethargy? Wow, that was a long sentence.

So basically saying that you had to force yourself to do something is a bit like saying that a rock is in constant battle with itself about whether to sit there or whether to get up and go for a walk. I mean, realistically it just stays where it’s put because that’s what it does. Whether you do things or not isn’t about internal conflict, it’s surely just about following your dictates – either dictates to animate yourself or dictates not to do so.

So why does it sometimes seem such a bloody enormous battle to convince oneself to even start doing a piece of work? What kind of stupid fucking evolutionary process ends up with procrastination, paralysis and apparent indolence? I mean, what kind of creature does well in the world by sitting at home in front of a computer for three hours in the early evening trying to motivate itself to write something about set-top boxes?! Where’s the reproductive advantage there?!

Stupid bloody world that should make me be this way and then make me neurotic about it.

Categories
Random

Links for 2005-01-10

Categories
Random

A quick cartoon from Hugh MacLeod…

Given my Zen-like state of calm today, this is potentially not the kind of thing I should be posting on my site in full view of my boss (hey dude). But it’s funny and it reminds me of a couple of weird working times in my life and the middle of one particularly appalling break-up and anyway, I’m still trying to procrastinate around writing up the Apple piece. Again. Sigh.

This is all inspired and illustrated by the book outline of How to be Creative by Hugh MacLeod, that I’ve just been reading about (again) over at his site. Early 30s people sure are a grouchy, disillusioned, stroppy, self-important and cynical bunch of bastards, aren’t they!

PS. Be warned, the linklog today is bloody enormous. It’s going to arrive around midnight with the force of a small atomic device. If you actually read any of the links I post, set aside a good hour tomorrow to work your way through them. Or just mark the damn thing as read in your RSS reader and skip on to something more useful.

Categories
Family

On writing to my father?

I’m still trying to get the Apple piece together into some kind of useful form which of course means that my mind keeps wandering and I keep writing other stuff instead. In a way, I’m quite enjoying it. Somehow it feels easier to write right now than at any time for the last several months. It’s really cathartic.

Well anyway, all of this preamble is kind of just here to stick some kind of frivolous emotional padding around one of the bigger things that is going on in my head at the moment. I hadn’t really decided whether or not I was going to talk about it online – indeed, I’ve only really mentioned it to about three people in the real world so far. And that includes no members of my family. But somehow the time is right and I want to make it slightly more real, so here we go.

Those of you who have been reading this site for a while might be vaguely familiar with the whole biological father narrative that I touch on very very infrequently, but the story in a nutshell is that I haven’t seen him or communicated with him since I was four or five. I’ve written about it more here:

So there’s the context… Now, a couple of days ago I was going through some old e-mail and came across a note from someone who mentioned a service you could use to search through the electoral roll. So on the spur of the moment I did a search on the site for my biological father’s name. I came up with about 18 candidates either called “Tom Coates”, or “Thomas J Coates”. And clearly because I was high on Getting Things Done or getting impatient with work or something, I just decided to write all of these potential fathers a letter straight away and send it out. So I wrote a letter that read very bluntly and strangely – like something that an a totally emotionally stunted person might write when his cat died or something. I guess it was pretty matter of fact. It just basically said that I was looking for some kind of limited contact with my father – just to know really whether he was alive or dead and to know some small amount about him – but that I wasn’t sure that I was looking for any kind of emotional committment or ongoing relationship or anything. I asked the recipient of the letter to pass on any information they might have, and – if they were my father – to please send some form of limited response. A few lines in a letter explaining what he was up to now and a photo would do very nicely.

So the thing about sending all these letters out is that I did it on the spur of the moment after almost thirty years and to be honest, each day I go into work I completely forget that I’ve done it. My brain’s always a complete blank – it’s thinking about Amazon or weblogs or home entertainment appliances or what happened on Alias last night. At least it is until someone around me gets some post. Then I start thinking about whether I’ll have got a reply of some kind and what kind of reply it might be. But the rest of the time, the whole thing seems like something someone else did. That’s why I thought I might write about it online. I thought maybe it would make it stick in my head better, make it more real. Maybe it won’t. Who knows.

Since I’ve started the whole palaver, I may as well carry it forward. If anyone out there knows a man called Tom Coates who worked for Honeywell computers in the 1970s who is in his early sixties – or indeed if you are this person – if you could send me even the most limited amount of information you might have that would be really good. I guess at this moment in time, I just want to know for sure whether or not my father is alive. No more than that. That’s about it. Hm.

This whole thing is all very strange and I don’t really know what I think about it. I’m certainly not looking for sympathy and I’m not trying to make a big drama about anything. This isn’t about some epic voyage of personal discovery, it’s about the pragmatics of the future. I’m 32 now. My father is likely to be 63. If I wanted to know something about him in ten years time, then it’s quite conceivable that it would be too late. It might be too late now. And while I don’t really know that the whole issue preys on my mind too much now, maybe it will later.

PS. You always write these things thinking they’re going to be so simple and easy and clean and then you get to the end and what you’ve got is a bloody disorganised mess of words slapped onto a page. I’m keeping the comments closed on this post because on previous occasions in the past I’ve had people gaming them – writing supposed comments from my father that I can’t substantiate. This does nothing but make me feel worse about the whole thing. If you want to contact me directly, the e-mail address remains the same – tom [at] plasticbag [dot] org. If you want to forward the post to anyone who might have worked at Honeywell or ICL, then that would be great. But please – don’t take the piss.

Categories
Random

A brief aside on Jerry Springer the Opera…

So I watched Jerry Springer The Opera last night on BBC2. It was pretty rude, pretty funny and had an interesting and surprisingly sophisticated philosophical outlook. I’m delighted that we live in a country where such things are broadcastable and I can’t really see why anyone would have had such a problem with it that they would have try and have it banned – particularly given the almost grotesque amounts of warnings that were placed around the show to try and avoid offending people. This was much less bizarre or troubling television than – say – the live Autopsy that was on Channel 4 a while back, or Derren Brown playing Russian Roulette.

The response around the net has been interesting and varied. Here’s a brief selection of some of the most interesting comments I’ve read on the subject:

Martin also mentions the BBC’s Points of View Messageboard where there’s been a lot of debate about the show – most of the comments that I’ve read at least have been highly supportive:

I should point out again that I’m also delighted that we live in a country where people are free to protest against things like Jerry Springer as well, and I understand that there is a complexity here about what is appropriate or innappropriate to broadcast. Certainly I’ve complained in the past to the BBC about things I think are unfair or dangerous or damaging. Sometimes I think the complexities of BBC policy on this stuff aren’t known to people outside the organisation. If you’re interested in knowing what the BBC thinks is appropriate or innapropriate (and what it judges itself against), then I can heartily recommend reading The Producer Guidelines which are well-polished and thorough.

Categories
Random

Links for 2005-01-09

Categories
Random

Being a filler post before the good stuff…

A while back I started getting really interested in home entertainment appliances and the future of pervasive computing in the home and stuff, but I haven’t really had enough time to really pursue my thoughts in this area too much. But earlier this year I started trying to assemble a picture in my head of what an Apple home entertainment appliance for the home would look like and how it would work. I had a really interesting conversation around this stuff with Kevin Marks in August or something, which got me fired up a bit more and several more with people at work that were variably useful. At a certain point I determined that pretty much everything I was thinking about was pretty unadventurous and everyone knew it already so I kind of left my sketches and doodles aside and only fiddled with them when no one was looking. Well anyway, the long and the short of it is that everyone’s now speculating about what Apple are going to release next week and a fair few of the speculations are unsurprisingly in the same path as my doodles were – particularly the fake mock-ups of an Apple Media Centre that have been circulating and Webb’s recent thoughts. So I’m going to try and drag everything together as quickly as possible and slap it up over the next 24 hours while it still might be of some limited interest to people… Um… That’s the lot for now, though…

Categories
Film Gay Politics

On Alexander and Uncle Tom…

The other day I was watching BBC Breakfast and they got their film critic on to talk about the premiere of Oliver Stone’s new film Alexander. Now Alexander has not got terribly good reviews and they showed a few clips of the director and some of the actors talking about why it’s been such a flop in the States. Oliver Stone’s opinion was that America had trouble with the idea of a general who had a long-standing homosexual relationship. Apparently in some parts of the States they wouldn’t even show it in theatres. As a consequence Stone decided to re-edit the film for the DVD release—presumably to remove some of the gay stuff.
To give you a bit of the context, here are some articles around the film:

Anyway, after seeing the interviews, BBC Breakfast dragged out their critic. And they asked him if it was true that the film was only rejected because of the gay stuff. And the critic said (and I paraphrase), Well, I hope that’s not the case. But in my opinion, if anything the film needed to be more gay—you know—camped up a bit! A bit more glam!
Nnngh! Nngh! Grrr! Nnngh! I mean for Christ’s sake—this is a film about a man who led armies across all of the known world—who pushed his people beyond the limits of that worldand who did it all in his twenties. This was an epic leader! This was one hell of a man! Why is it so extraordinary to want to represent this hero of Macedonia seriously? Some cultures thought he was a monster of enormous proportions. Other cultures idolised him. Classical academics who are not generally prone to hyperbolae referred to him as “undoubtedly the greatest general of his race and probably of antiquity”. This isn’t some made up piece of modern hokum like Gladiator was – nor is it an attempt to represent an ancient literary work and mythological tradition like Troy. Why on earth would you want to ‘camp it up’?
Now, I’ve now gone and seen the film. I was determined to see it and pretty determined to enjoy it and to find value in it. But I can report that it is not a particularly good film. It has really good bits in it if you’re prepared for the crap, but it’s badly structured and clumsy and has obviously been hacked to pieces for time. Whole sections of the life of Alexander are excised or put in briefly as flashbacks, some characters are hammy beyond belief and for some extraordinary reason everyone in Macedonia speaks with an Irish accent. I mean, I could go on all day with the things that are wrong with it.
But there are things that it’s been criticised for unfairly, and—worse—reactions from audiences and critics that demean themselves and our culture. Whenever Alexander was seen to be interested in someone malethis epic leader and warrior became suddenly subject to titters and giggles from the auditorium. Because it’s apparently laughable—embarrassing even—to imagine that a great warrior could have been more interested in men than women. The sincerity of the feeling that Alexander evidences is apparently ludicrous to these people. That’s why they need the film ‘camped up’ a bit—because most of the modern western world appears to be prudish or infantile when it comes to sex and feeling, and completely unprepared to deal with different cultural morays or with the representation of a character who managed to be larger than any of them will ever be, while also fucking men.
Having been in the auditorium with these reactions, I think I can state right-out that there is homophobia in the way this film has been received. I think that’s true. It’s only one reason that the film has failed of course—there are dozens of others—but it’s certainly one of them. And in experiencing people’s reaction to the film, I’m reminded more and more that the successes in gay rights over the last ten years or so have also ushered in an Uncle Tom-ish culture of the desexualised, non-threatening and funny little poof who is apologetically grateful for the positive reaction he can get from straight people by being entertaining. I’m increasingly angry about the way that we’ve petitioned for rights by turning everything about ourselves that could be possibly considered threatening into some kind of joke. Alexander the Great was no man’s bloody pet.
You can find out more about Alexander the Great at these various sites:

Categories
Random

Links for 2005-01-07

Categories
Personal Publishing

On Six Apart and Livejournal…

So Six Apart have bought Livejournal after all. Here’s a brief story about how I didn’t find out about it… I was chatting to Mena yesterday about something else and couldn’t resist querying her about the rumours. Very patiently, and I suspect with some kind of tiny smile just about visible on her concealed-by-IM face, Mena politely informed that she didn’t respond to rumours and speculation. To which the only real response was, “If you won’t respond, will Anil?”

I didn’t get a direct answer to that question, but I did promise to let Mena know if Anil spilled the beans. I figure she’d want to give him a present or a bunch of flowers or something. She’s so nice. But then I forgot to ask him anyway. And so it goes…

Anyway, the news was announced relatively late last night as far as I can tell, which means that those of us on this side of the Atlantic probably heard about it before most of the US webloggers. Mena’s done a comprehensive write-up on Mena’s Corner – as has Brad on his Livejournal. They’re both pretty excited about the acquisition – and I think with good reason. There are people who aren’t so sure about the whole thing – and I think their anxieties are pretty reasonable (Danah’s post on the subject in probably one of the best), but I really think there are more opportunities here than problems. Bringing Livejournal into the weblogging fold (or bringing weblogs closer into the Livejournal fold) could be tremendously interesting. I’d be interested to see whether there was any further development of Livejournal-style networking and social networking stuff. It would seem to have lots of possibilities (and even webloggers love this stuff – check out their adoration of Flikr if you don’t believe me). And if it was possible to bring some of that overt social stuff over into MT or Typepad – by cross-platform protocols or whatever – then I can’t help but think that would be a good thing. I’m also really interested in the role of Typekey in all of this stuff.

The real threat is to the successful integration of the whole thing is – I think – not that Livejournal’s community is put under threat, but that their understated aesthetic has a kind of punk-cool and authenticity that could be polished out of existence by the really terribly good designers at SixApart. Livejournal has the feel of a grass-roots, bottom-up, wildly successful community project, where MT, Blogger et al kind of don’t. The slightly ramshackle look-and-feel is a core part of that, I think.

Anyway, all in all a pretty interesting day for webloggery and Livejournalhood. I’m really interested in how Blogger fits into all this though. At the moment, it’s pretty clear that the fire and the dynamism is with SixApart. They’re the people innovating (at least publically). Which leaves me with two questions (1) are Blogger becoming also-rans or (2) what the hell are they planning?

PS. Hey, guess what! Latest rumour I heard was that SixApart were going to acquire the previously-public sector, non-weblog-producing national-broadcaster of the UK, the BBC. The move is expected to slightly increase their staffing levels from something like 70 people to something more like 35,000 while reinforcing their otherwise lacking “Eastenders” arm of the business! Ok, maybe I made that last bit up…