Categories
Random

Links for 2006-01-05

Categories
Humour

In praise of chocolate business cards…

Earlier this year I went to State of Play III and I always meant to write up what happened there, but I never had time. Too easily distracted by shiny new things and by the confusion of switching jobs and trying to make sense of Yahoo and worrying about things and playing a little too much World of Warcraft (European servers / Dendrassil / Pentheus or Andromache – should you want to say hello).

Well don’t think for one moment that any of that confusion has changed, or that I suddenly have enormously more time, because I don’t. And this is simply another post in the ‘any movement is good movement’ attempt to unclog my weblogging self. So what I’m going to talk about instead is the really cool chocolate business card that Kenyon & Kenyon gave out in the goodie-bags, which I’ve just rediscovered, photographed and then promptly eaten. The chocolate was at the better end of American shop confectionary, but not enormously good. But it was free, and it sure as hell made me remember the company. Maybe you could make business cards out of pressed ¬£50 bills or something. That would probably rock a little more. But not much…

Addendum: (Added Thursday January 5th 2006): I’ve just got an e-mail from Justin Blanton who did an internship with Kenyon last summer and says that for Christmas 2004 they got given a huge slab of chocolate decorated with a picture of their New York offices on the front. You can see the beautiful object here: Kenyon Christmas Chocolate.

Categories
Design

On the clumsy milking of mass amateurisation…

It’s reading all this processed text that gets me so backed-up, I’m sure. I need a webloggic irrigation to get the flow back. But at the moment, every scant fragment is a movement in the right direction, so I’m going to start with this little tiny observation. I’ve talked before about mass amateurisation and how larger companies are spotting the creative activity that’s bubbling up from the newly empowered masses. Sometimes, of course, these larger companies don’t always operate as scrupulously as they might. So I was out the other day with Mo Morgan and his lovely lady, and we spotted this in a highly-designed expensive-looking shop called Carbon 28 on Neal Street in London:

It’s fairly entertaining, I suppose – there’s something about Princess Leia holographic projectors in there and light sabres and bionic eyes. It’s just a shame it’s a reworking of the rather well-known, rather funnier and rather better printed shirt on Threadless. Now I don’t think there’s anything illegal about this – the two shirts are different enough from one another, and you could probably even argue that the Carbon28 t-shirt is a parody of the Threadless one. But it’s… disappointing… you know? Cheap. Clumsy. Inarticulate, inelegant and tawdry. We should be doing better by each other.

Categories
Random

Links for 2006-01-04

Categories
Random

Links for 2006-01-02

  • Mr Morgan cut all his hair off! This is almost certainly of limited interest to those of you who don’t know early UK weblogger and notable grumpy bugger Mo Morgan. But for those who do know him, woyzer!
Categories
Random

Links for 2005-12-22

Categories
Random

Links for 2005-12-21

Categories
Life

A quick note from jetlaggia…

It’s this direction that’s the killer – not being able to sleep until 4 or 5am and not feeling awake and fresh until the middle of the afternoon. I’ve been back in the UK for a couple of days, but I’m still living in that hallucinogenic twitchy overwarm zombie space, and I suspect I’ve got at least one more day of it to go. Thank god for Christmas. Posting will be irregular until the middle of next week, I suspect. Fragments of my incoming stimuli will continue to be captured on my Flickr photostream as normal.

Categories
Random

Links for 2005-12-18

Categories
Random

Links for 2005-12-16

  • Wikipedia survives research test “The free online resource Wikipedia is about as accurate on science as the Encyclopedia Britannica, a study shows. The British journal Nature examined a range of scientific entries on both works of reference and found few differences in accuracy.”