- Kevin Marks on the BBC’s move towards more podcasts. He also suggests a ‘world service hack’ plus the creative archive could get around the UK-only restrictions.
Unfortunately as I understand it, the World Service isn’t paid for with the TV licence fee, but instead by the Foreign Office. I don’t think it gets free unlimited access to the BBC’s archives in perpetuity like that… - Apparently twelve year old fluffy muppet man to take over as Doctor Who
Although I’m still secretly seething about Eccleston’s ponce-off… - BBC News reports on Radio and Music opening up 20 more shows as podcasts…
And includes a classic picture of what they apparently think people who use iPods look like. Classy.
Year: 2005
I run an online community called Barbelith. Or to put that another way, I maintain the software and the community – for the most part – runs itself. This community doesn’t have an over-arching mission or subject that everyone talks about – although there are sections on philosophy, science, mysticism, politics, literature (and many more). But the attitude and approach is the most important thing about the board – it endeavours (and in places succeeds) in being a place where you can have some of the highest quality discussions online with people who are prepared to engage and interrogate without being insulting. Members of the board tend towards the left or towards libertarianism, tend towards atheism or mysticism and are a real mix of creative individuals – from university lecturers, psychologists, artists, screen-writers, novelists… I think it gets its value from having such a lot of different perspectives able to work and engage with each other – and I like the fact that the various forums within it have incredibly distinct atmospheres while still allowing people to cross-polonate and move between its various areas. That’s not to say it’s perfect, by any means. Not every conversation goes brilliantly and not every thread is as engaging and thorough. But when it’s good, it’s really really good.
One area of the board that I really think could do with more rigor and more enthusiasm is around the area of science and technology. The culture is a little too heavily weighted towards philosophers, social scientists and humanities graduates at the moment, and I think it could really benefit from having other perspectives and knowledge of the kinds of innovations and developments that you can read about in publications like New Scientist or on Slashdot or Boing Boing, Pasta and Vinegar or We Make Money Not Art.
So I’m putting out a call for renaissance geeks, scientists, webloggers and technologists with a wide range of interests to come and join our little community. I’m looking for a group of twenty or thirty people who could really take hold of the Laboratory forum and push it in exciting areas – and who think they could use the extraordinary enthusiasm and multiplicity of perspectives from the rest of the board as personal inspiration.
The board’s membership at the moment is highly limited and pretty much invitation-only, so if you’re interested in joining then let me know by e-mail – my address as ever is tom@ and then plasticbag.org. If you could put in a few lines about the work you do and about your interest in science and technology that will make everything easier (and I’m afraid I really need people to have work or university or personal domain-name-based e-mail addresses – no gmail or hotmail ones will work). And as soon as I’ve got a decent number of people, I’ll send out an invitiation to all of you at once.
If you are not a technologist or scientist and still want to join then don’t despair. There is another approach to getting on the board at the moment as outlined in this thread: The practical facts about our new system for membership ‘by invitation only’. I’m particularly keen to see people interested in art, design and fashion join up along with young film-makers and – as ever – political activists / indymedia types. But my personal preferences aren’t going to stop you joining. That stuff’s up to the rest of em.
Oh and the other, other weird news of the day – as some of you have noticed – is that quite a lot of my archive pages are a bit borked at the moment. Sorry about that, I know it looks cheap and clumsy, and it’ll all be fixed by the end of the weekend.
The other big news today from BBC Radio & Music Interactive (where I work) is that we’re about to open up twenty more programmes – mostly from Radio 4 and Five Live as podcast feeds for people to download. As my semi-ultimate boss said:
“The BBC was the first British broadcaster to podcast when we made In Our Time available last year and this trial will enable us to further explore the editorial, technical and distribution issues involved.”
Some of the programmes that you will be able to subscribe to include (in full or part): The Today Programme, The Reith Lectures, In Our Time, In Business, From Our Own Correspondent, Sportsweek and Fighting Talk plus highlights and documentaries from Radio 1, 1Xtra and the World Service.
For more information see the BBC Press release and the article in Media Guardian. I’m really excited by this stuff, for a whole range of reasons personally. And with sites like Odeo on the horizon, I can’t help but think this whole area’s about to explode.
My vain search for a simple business card…
I have a strange request for help from you guys – the wider weblogging community – and it’s not terribly interesting, I’m afraid. I’m really enjoying the process of creating my new stark and simple templates for plasticbag.org and I’m also kind of obsessed with various elements of the typography and layout. My typographically snobbish co-worked, Mr Matt Patterson, isn’t quite so impressed by the work I’m doing – but I don’t care! I think it’s good!
Anyway, my newfound love for my site, my new simple clean aesthetic (which everyone will hate) and my long-standing desire to create some kind of weblog-related swag (as was the fashion a few years ago) leads me to a fundamental desire to get some weird business cards made, through which I can show off. Unfortunately, I have an incredibly precise vision in my head – and it’s of totally clear, square-cornered cards made of some substance like acetate. I want to place a few plain black words in a couple of fonts onto this shining piece of clarity and nothing more. But I can’t find anywhere in London that does anything like this at all.
So I’m appealing to you – my fellow aesthetes and egomaniacs – does anyone out there know where I can get something at once so simple yet brazen and showy as a thin totally clear plastic card? Please?
Links for 2005-04-14
- Creative Archive Licence
I’m really interested in this – I wonder if it only applies to audio and video or whether this is basically a license that describes ‘public service’ uses of BBC content… - British Blog Directory also has charts to help people track the traffic of top British Weblogs
It’s a really interesting idea, and I’ve decided to register because I’m no better than anyone else and it’s time people realised that I don’t really get that much traffic…
Links for 2005-04-13
- Tiger’s launch date has been announced – April 29th
So the question now is how best to get hold of it with the least hassle, and who’s hosting the install party…
On my favourite books…
Okay. I don’t normally do these things and please God don’t take this as an opportunity to start sending me more of them, but I’m going to respond to Lubin Odana’s book-reading memetic challenge. I don’t normally do these kinds of things because I don’t really think they’re aimed at me. I think they’re really good ways to introduce people to the wider world, to help people get a grasp on your character and stuff, and that if people haven’t figured out what I’m like by now after five years of slapping this rubbish on the internet, then they basically never will. Still never mind, here we go…
You’re stuck inside Fahrenheit 451, which book do you want to be? This is a really tricky one for me. Probably my all-time favourite book is Kurt Vonnegut’s Slaughterhouse 5 which I’ll talk about in a bit. But another favourite of mine is a book called Ready to Catch him Should he Fall by Neil Bartlett which I think is one of the few books that I’ve read that managed to capture a powerful and natural-feeling, balanced idea of a non-hetero-orthodox gay relationship. I found it incredibly powerful and interesting. More importantly, I’m much less confident that anyone else would look after it in a dystopian future than I am about Slaughterhouse 5, and someone has to stand up for the poofs and it might as well be me.
Have you ever had a crush on a fictional character? God, I have absolutely no idea. Probably when I was much younger I thought that Keill Randor from Planet of the Warlord was unbelievably hot and there was some weird S&M plot in that book too which probably did a lot to confuse my teenage mind. There are many characters in books that I’ve idolised in various ways – Des Esseintes in Huysmans’ Against Nature was probably a core one. And Dionysus in Euripides’ Bacchae. But I think probably I have more crushes on fictional characters from TV shows, comics and films than I do from books. This probably suggests that what people look like is important to me. So I’d talk about Booster Gold from his original comic book series, Dr John Carter from the first few seasons of E.R., Ricky Fitts from American Beauty, Han Solo / Indiana Jones and maybe the Colonel from Stargate. I’m so shallow that the slightest drop of water would find no rest in my embrace…
The last book you bought was: Terrifyingly it was Getting Things Done by Dave Allen. I bought it months ago and have bought no books since because I’ve been busy and found it difficult to focus. I read about half of it. Then got stuck. Stick that in your pipe and smoke it.
What are you currently reading? On my last count I had 160 open tabs in Safari, I had 30 open tabs in NetNewsWire, I had 3000 unread posts in my newsreader and I had 27,000 unread e-mails across my work and personal e-mail accounts. What the crap do you think I’m reading?
Five Books you would take to a desert island:
- A Heartbreaking Work of Staggering Genius by Dave Eggers – A sprawling, indolent and defiantly (arrogantly) colloquial / personal autobiography that pushes many of my fantasy buttons – being able to hang out with my brother a lot, being relatively free in the world, being able to be creative and misbehave, working and living in San Francisco.
- The New York Trilogy by Paul Auster – or ideally a huge anthology of all of Paul Auster’s books. The thing about these books for me is that their resemblence to reality seems entirely incidental to the clean arcing groves of plot and narrative that don’t necessarily convey you through character but which one feels (if one could move abstractly in a direction orthogonal to the book) would look so perfect and structural when observed from ‘above’.
- Lord of the Rings by JRR Tolkein – honestly because it’s the longest book I’ve ever read and because it’s wide and deep enough to get lost in for long periods of time. It appeals to the completist and the geek within me, always looking for consistent continuities and wanting to be convinced that the world could be something other than it is.
- Slaugherhouse 5 by Kurt Vonnegut – a time-travelling blackly comic war novel. I think that you can deduce much about my character from this book. Science fiction books and fantasy novels are read by people ill-adjusted to reality, the same people who write comic books and aspire towards making future technology that will make everyone happy. This book has that in it. These people are also kind of childish, and if confronted by the world directly seem to only be able to understand it in terms of black humour. This book has that in it. There’s also a desperation and a wit to it as well that I really respond to. I don’t know if this is a particularly happy description of my personality, but there you go.
- Gravity’s Rainbow or V by Thomas Pynchon – because I haven’t completely read either of them, and they’re rich and deep and thrillingly written enough to last a while and continue to resonate and mean for a long period of time (and because I’ll never read them in the meantime).
I’d also take with me about four hundred dodgy comic books and a pile of DVDs. But hey. Anyway, I hope that’s satisfactory and interesting enough for you filthy voyeurs out there in realspace. I’m going to pass the challenge on to some people who almost certainly won’t want to go near it: Dan Hill because he’s my boss and needs to suffer, Stefan Magdalinski because he’s a stroppy bastard and as such I’d enjoy hearing his rants and Matt Jones because he reads weird shit…
On RSS feeds and upcoming redesigns…
This is more of an update than a post and won’t be of enormous interest to an awful lot of you, I’m sure. Basically for those of you reading this site via an RSS newsreader, I’ve decided to remove the splicing of photographs from my Flickr photostream. This is for a number of reasons, but mainly because I’ve started to feel a bit uncomfortable about the enormous shifts in tone between the two feeds and how they inter-relate to one another. If you enjoy seeing pictures from my photostream however, you can still subscribe to a dedicated feed.
For those of you who are not familiar with the plasticbag.org feed, or with newsreaders in general, then I can recommend the Wikipedia article on RSS and newsreaders and if you’re using a Mac, then NetNewsWire remains the client of choice.
This little job is just the first of a large number of changes that you should be seeing around the site over the next few weeks as I work to redesign the place from the ground-up. I can warn you now that many of you are not going to like what I’m going to do with the place. I’m taking it very stark and simple. But I’m finding it quite exciting. If you’re of the speculative sort, then why not have a look at my page on a design history of plasticbag.org and see if you can spot the trends.
Links for 2005-04-12
- Face transformer
I can’t believe I didn’t bookmark this at the time – upload your photograph, and then you can feminise it, make it look older or younger or of a different race, etc…