Categories
Random

Links for 2005-01-09

Categories
Random

Being a filler post before the good stuff…

A while back I started getting really interested in home entertainment appliances and the future of pervasive computing in the home and stuff, but I haven’t really had enough time to really pursue my thoughts in this area too much. But earlier this year I started trying to assemble a picture in my head of what an Apple home entertainment appliance for the home would look like and how it would work. I had a really interesting conversation around this stuff with Kevin Marks in August or something, which got me fired up a bit more and several more with people at work that were variably useful. At a certain point I determined that pretty much everything I was thinking about was pretty unadventurous and everyone knew it already so I kind of left my sketches and doodles aside and only fiddled with them when no one was looking. Well anyway, the long and the short of it is that everyone’s now speculating about what Apple are going to release next week and a fair few of the speculations are unsurprisingly in the same path as my doodles were – particularly the fake mock-ups of an Apple Media Centre that have been circulating and Webb’s recent thoughts. So I’m going to try and drag everything together as quickly as possible and slap it up over the next 24 hours while it still might be of some limited interest to people… Um… That’s the lot for now, though…

Categories
Film Gay Politics

On Alexander and Uncle Tom…

The other day I was watching BBC Breakfast and they got their film critic on to talk about the premiere of Oliver Stone’s new film Alexander. Now Alexander has not got terribly good reviews and they showed a few clips of the director and some of the actors talking about why it’s been such a flop in the States. Oliver Stone’s opinion was that America had trouble with the idea of a general who had a long-standing homosexual relationship. Apparently in some parts of the States they wouldn’t even show it in theatres. As a consequence Stone decided to re-edit the film for the DVD release—presumably to remove some of the gay stuff.

To give you a bit of the context, here are some articles around the film:

Anyway, after seeing the interviews, BBC Breakfast dragged out their critic. And they asked him if it was true that the film was only rejected because of the gay stuff. And the critic said (and I paraphrase), Well, I hope that’s not the case. But in my opinion, if anything the film needed to be more gay—you know—camped up a bit! A bit more glam!

Nnngh! Nngh! Grrr! Nnngh! I mean for Christ’s sake—this is a film about a man who led armies across all of the known world—who pushed his people beyond the limits of that worldand who did it all in his twenties. This was an epic leader! This was one hell of a man! Why is it so extraordinary to want to represent this hero of Macedonia seriously? Some cultures thought he was a monster of enormous proportions. Other cultures idolised him. Classical academics who are not generally prone to hyperbolae referred to him as “undoubtedly the greatest general of his race and probably of antiquity”. This isn’t some made up piece of modern hokum like Gladiator was – nor is it an attempt to represent an ancient literary work and mythological tradition like Troy. Why on earth would you want to ‘camp it up’?

Now, I’ve now gone and seen the film. I was determined to see it and pretty determined to enjoy it and to find value in it. But I can report that it is not a particularly good film. It has really good bits in it if you’re prepared for the crap, but it’s badly structured and clumsy and has obviously been hacked to pieces for time. Whole sections of the life of Alexander are excised or put in briefly as flashbacks, some characters are hammy beyond belief and for some extraordinary reason everyone in Macedonia speaks with an Irish accent. I mean, I could go on all day with the things that are wrong with it.

But there are things that it’s been criticised for unfairly, and—worse—reactions from audiences and critics that demean themselves and our culture. Whenever Alexander was seen to be interested in someone malethis epic leader and warrior became suddenly subject to titters and giggles from the auditorium. Because it’s apparently laughable—embarrassing even—to imagine that a great warrior could have been more interested in men than women. The sincerity of the feeling that Alexander evidences is apparently ludicrous to these people. That’s why they need the film ‘camped up’ a bit—because most of the modern western world appears to be prudish or infantile when it comes to sex and feeling, and completely unprepared to deal with different cultural morays or with the representation of a character who managed to be larger than any of them will ever be, while also fucking men.

Having been in the auditorium with these reactions, I think I can state right-out that there is homophobia in the way this film has been received. I think that’s true. It’s only one reason that the film has failed of course—there are dozens of others—but it’s certainly one of them. And in experiencing people’s reaction to the film, I’m reminded more and more that the successes in gay rights over the last ten years or so have also ushered in an Uncle Tom-ish culture of the desexualised, non-threatening and funny little poof who is apologetically grateful for the positive reaction he can get from straight people by being entertaining. I’m increasingly angry about the way that we’ve petitioned for rights by turning everything about ourselves that could be possibly considered threatening into some kind of joke. Alexander the Great was no man’s bloody pet.

You can find out more about Alexander the Great at these various sites:

Categories
Random

Links for 2005-01-07

Categories
Personal Publishing

On Six Apart and Livejournal…

So Six Apart have bought Livejournal after all. Here’s a brief story about how I didn’t find out about it… I was chatting to Mena yesterday about something else and couldn’t resist querying her about the rumours. Very patiently, and I suspect with some kind of tiny smile just about visible on her concealed-by-IM face, Mena politely informed that she didn’t respond to rumours and speculation. To which the only real response was, “If you won’t respond, will Anil?”

I didn’t get a direct answer to that question, but I did promise to let Mena know if Anil spilled the beans. I figure she’d want to give him a present or a bunch of flowers or something. She’s so nice. But then I forgot to ask him anyway. And so it goes…

Anyway, the news was announced relatively late last night as far as I can tell, which means that those of us on this side of the Atlantic probably heard about it before most of the US webloggers. Mena’s done a comprehensive write-up on Mena’s Corner – as has Brad on his Livejournal. They’re both pretty excited about the acquisition – and I think with good reason. There are people who aren’t so sure about the whole thing – and I think their anxieties are pretty reasonable (Danah’s post on the subject in probably one of the best), but I really think there are more opportunities here than problems. Bringing Livejournal into the weblogging fold (or bringing weblogs closer into the Livejournal fold) could be tremendously interesting. I’d be interested to see whether there was any further development of Livejournal-style networking and social networking stuff. It would seem to have lots of possibilities (and even webloggers love this stuff – check out their adoration of Flikr if you don’t believe me). And if it was possible to bring some of that overt social stuff over into MT or Typepad – by cross-platform protocols or whatever – then I can’t help but think that would be a good thing. I’m also really interested in the role of Typekey in all of this stuff.

The real threat is to the successful integration of the whole thing is – I think – not that Livejournal’s community is put under threat, but that their understated aesthetic has a kind of punk-cool and authenticity that could be polished out of existence by the really terribly good designers at SixApart. Livejournal has the feel of a grass-roots, bottom-up, wildly successful community project, where MT, Blogger et al kind of don’t. The slightly ramshackle look-and-feel is a core part of that, I think.

Anyway, all in all a pretty interesting day for webloggery and Livejournalhood. I’m really interested in how Blogger fits into all this though. At the moment, it’s pretty clear that the fire and the dynamism is with SixApart. They’re the people innovating (at least publically). Which leaves me with two questions (1) are Blogger becoming also-rans or (2) what the hell are they planning?

PS. Hey, guess what! Latest rumour I heard was that SixApart were going to acquire the previously-public sector, non-weblog-producing national-broadcaster of the UK, the BBC. The move is expected to slightly increase their staffing levels from something like 70 people to something more like 35,000 while reinforcing their otherwise lacking “Eastenders” arm of the business! Ok, maybe I made that last bit up…

Categories
Random

Links for 2005-01-06

Categories
Social Software

An addendum to a definition of Social Software

I’m loath to wake the old evil beastie of definitions of social software, but I came across some old notes that I sent off to someone in October and I’d like to keep track of it for later. Basically the question was could you produce a short and pithy, mostly accurate short-hand description of social software that mostly worked. I came up with:

Social Software can be loosely defined as software which supports, extends, or derives added value from, human social behaviour – message-boards, musical taste-sharing, photo-sharing, instant messaging, mailing lists, social networking.

I slapped a lot of examples in there because it seemed to clarify the issue a bit. Note, this is a shorthand, and nothing more – my fuller posts on the subject include: My working definition of social software but I think maybe I prefer this shorter, rotted-down and composted version.

Categories
Net Culture

Old news: Firefox in the New York Times…

Final old news entry of the night, I think. It’s 1.30am and frankly I’m not as young and spritely as I once was. So anyway a while back I linked to a hooji whereby you could get your name in an advert in the New York Times by donating some money to Firefox. My link read as follows:

Help promote Firefox by getting your name in the New York Times $30 a shot gets you a name in the New York Times advert as well as helping the open source community and encouraging real human beings to use the best browser on the PC (although not necessarily on the Mac)

Long and the short of it – they ran the advert a while back. It looked great, did the job (see some stats on browser usage) and indeed my name and the names of my web-lovin’ peers around the world were all dutifully recorded. I feel quite proud about the whole thing, in a vaguely dumb and clumsy way. You can read all about the advert at the spread firefox site, or – if you’re particularly weird – you can just have a quick glance at the tiny part of the advert which has my name on it:

Well I thought it was neat…

Categories
Random

Old news: Bloggies…

What else is going on? Er… Well, The Bloggies are up for nominations again – of all the weblog awards these are the ones that I think most accurately reflect the community that I know and understand, even though I’m a bit fatigued by even these least dodgy and most attractively low-key of community awardages.

Normally I would be standing up here and making a passionate case for why I deserved to be queen of blogworldia this year, because it’s fun to be queen, it’s trivial as all buggery and because certain categories are basically really fun to be nominated in (the gay category is always a shit-flinging bitchfight to the death, even though Ernie always wins it each and every year). Realistically, though, I’m not sure that I could stand up and say hand-on-heart that my site’s been terribly interesting or useful or fun this year. I think work’s kind of colonised my life a bit and my site’s suffered. But nonetheless, if you’ve taken a few too many diet pills this evening and are feeling particularly buzzy in the mind, then you could always nominate plasticbag.org for ‘Best British or Irish Weblog’, ‘Best Computers and Technology Weblog’, ‘Best weblog written by a gayer’ or whatever. Lifetime achievement would be nice too, except realistically someone needs to give that one to Haughey or Blood already….

To be honest, if there’s any value in these competitions whatsoever it’s in weblog discovery – helping people out there find some new unexpectedly awesome people to read about, interact with and hang out with online. So whether or not you want to participate in the damn thing, can I recommend at the very least you go and acquaint yourselves with some of the following sites and services:

Categories
Random

Old news: What happened with the Tiny Hat Project…

So I’ve been a bit low-key on the web recently so I thought maybe I’d post a few updates around individual themes. First up, old news about the Innocent Smoothies-inspired Tiny Hat Project. For those of you who don’t know what I’m talking about, here is the description I posted on the second of December:

“Concept in a nutshell: buy drinks with hats, give money to charity, wear tiny hat, get someone to take a photo, look dumb, get dumped by your partner, embrace the fundamental pain of existence. You know, for kids!”

The next thing that happens after we’re all rolling around from how funny we are with our tiny little hats is that I get a phone call from Innocent Smoothies, who are duly excited about the whole thing and want to send us free smoothies. Dumbstruck I agree delightedly and tell everyone around us the story of free smoothiedom. We all wonder to ourselves whether the drinks will have the requisite little tiny hats. Perhaps they’ll have new flavours or something…

The days pass and no tiny hats arrive. Increasingly mortified, I become embittered by the world, and – to try and feel better in my desperate isolation – turn to drugs and murder and the humiliation of children. But still, nothing arrives… Until finally I get a phone call from reception – or more to the point Webb gets a phone-call from reception. Apparently the drinks have been sitting in the post-office for several days now uncollected, have gone off and fermented, exploded a little bit and ruined a bit of the carpet. They are thrown away…

Consequence of which is that my faith in Innocent has been restored, which makes me feel better. On the other hand, my faith in the communications around the BBC has been dented a bit. And I have no more little hats, or health giving smoothie-related vitamins. But I have a vaguely entertaining story to tell, so in the end everything worked out okay. Or so everyone will believe until I die of scurvy…