Category: Random

Reasons not to read any Blake’s Seven books (as written by members of the original cast – no matter how cool they might have been): Barbelith.

It used to be the staple of weblogging content – the announcement that someone (a friend / a company) has redesigned their site. Then everyone used to run over and point and critique the site in question and have a little think about whether or not it worked or not as a design and maybe make a few pointers. People don’t do that so much any more. I wonder why. Announcement: Barty Trabaca has redesigned!

VITAL: Read the responses to A small note from a patriot.

K10k is back and it’s as futuretech and tiny-fonted as ever. Watch as it makes your connection shudder with tiny pixel-goodness. Shiver as your browser struggles to render it. Be awed at its ridiculously high quality. Miss the tiny animated buttons that span round. Be generally very impressed by it, but not that surprised by it. Our rating: Fucking impressive, but not dramatically different.

Today I have a stinking cold. I had it yesterday as well. Last night I felt like someone had drained my soul out of my feet. I had nightmares all night as well. But I can’t remember any of them. Here are some salient facts you might like to know about colds:

– Every year Americans suffer 1 billion colds.
– Exposure to cold weather does not cause the common cold.
– But cold-causing viruses often survive better in low humidity conditions – for example in the colder months.
– Using aspirin to treat a cold may make you more infectious as you increase the concentration of the virus in your sneezes.
– There is no definitive evidence that vitamin C eases or prevents colds.
– Some people say that Zinc Acetate Lozenges are a clinically proven cold cure. I suspect this may be bullshit.
– If you take normal decongestants and the like you’re less likely to splurt out viruses out your nose. You may spread less colds this way.
– Drinking milk does not increase green nasal cold goo.
– Taking Echincea apparently costs a lot and doesn’t do much if anything.

I forget where I found out most of those things. I should probably conclude with a US-style disclaimer: “Warning: May be Bullshit! If you die it’s not my fault!”

One of the things that I talked about in my interview for the role of community producer at the BBC – a job that I didn’t get, by the way – was about how the BBC was perfectly placed to be the people who made Microsoft’s passport program obselete. I mean, they’re not beholden to any corporate interests, they wouldn’t be able to sell your details to marketers and they have have the infrastructure and world-wide reknown to get away with it. But I wish they’d get a move on.

This is almost impossibly close to an idea I once had and have never implemented. Mine was dirtier though.

Cut and Paste Culture: Ok – this is interesting. Or at least I think it’s interesting. Or more to the point, I find it interesting. Anyway – I have these two gorgeous computers on my desk – one’s a stunning PC, one’s a much more stunning iMac. And I often find myself trying to do things on the PC that can only be done easily on a Mac – like viewing .js files for example. On the Mac, you just open it in IE and it displays on screen. The default position for the PC seems to be to try and run it. Very annoying. So I’m working in Frontpage (don’t ask) on the PC and I have the javascript open in the browser window on the Mac, and I copy the chunk I want on the Mac, then turn around and pick up a different mouse and try and paste it into the PC. And it doesn’t work. And I look at the screen in blank astonishment. This has happened several times and every time I’m surprised.

So what I’m thinking is, when we cut or copy something from a computer, do we somehow think that we’ve picked it up physically? Or that we as individuals have kind of copied it to our individual head-space? Or am I just really lame?

I’m sorry, but really. What the hell is Google Answers all about?

Thoughts on the fronts of men’s trousers: Many trousers seem to me to be designed to work a little like cod-pieces. The rucking at the front is designed to give an impossibly ridiculous cock-like peak that clearly ISN’T cock, but by its presence distracts from bulges, shapes etc that could be considered cock-like. All men in the world can be divided into those who wear trousers that accentuate their cock or replace it with something larger, or those that wear trousers that manfully withhold themselves. It’s uncouth to take your cock out in public. Similarly, it’s vulgar to wear trousers that have a sole purpose of cock enhancement. Or such is my opinion…